Is SRM Worth the Investment?

By Paulo Moretti

March 28, 2014 at 12:55 PM

I was recently interviewed by Dustin Mattison, Publisher at, where you can also hear the recording of the interview. 

We talked about Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) and the preliminary results of a recent SRM benchmark study. Below is a transcript of the interview.

Please give us a brief background about yourself:

I worked for 35 years at Dow Chemical in different areas like Manufacturing, R&D, Sales, Marketing, Finance, Strategic Planning, e-Business, and (the last 12 years in) Purchasing. In 2012, I started a consultant firm called PM2Consult, with a focus in Purchasing.  I am also a Senior Consultant at Vantage Partners.

Where are we now with Supplier Relationship Management?

I think it is a hot topic today, and several leading consultant companies have endorsed the need of SRM.

  • A.T. Kearney: “Leaders use SRM process more consistently than followers.
  • Deloitte Consulting: “SRM is underinvested due to immediate savings priority.
  • Hackett Group: “SRM is the hottest area today.
  • IBM: “Supplier collaboration helps top performers bring the outside in. 

I think I’m able to answer this question with data because we at Vantage Partners just finished a huge benchmark study.   

We had over 800 responses from all kinds of sectors like Mining, Arts & Entertainment, Manufacturing, Health Care, Finance, Transportation, etc. This survey reached companies with a total revenue of almost $5 trillion or 6.8% of world GDP, so I believe we have enough data to talk about it.

  • 78% of responses said they have some kind of SRM practice in place. However, only 10% of them said they have reached maturity or highly effective organization in terms of SRM.
  • They said that they have reached only 44% of potential value available, so there is a potential to achieve value at 1.5 times what they’ve got.
  • Regarding investment and return, they said they have invested $3.5B to date. Last year’s return reported by all companies reached $14.3B. So, you see that I’m comparing the investment to date with last year’s return, and the reason is that the investment in SRM takes time to realize.
  • So, there is no doubt that investment in SRM has yielded excellent returns.



Why are we where we are?

The data indicates that there is a good correlation of investment made in SRM and results achieved. Each company is in a different level of maturity in terms of SRM, so the investment needed may be in different areas.

  • Investments are made in formal SRM governance mechanisms and business processes like joint strategic planning, and performance reviews yield large payoffs.
  • Investment is critical in individual skill-building for staff with interactions with suppliers. The benchmark data show that this investment will be one the highest priorities in the next 3-5 years. 
  • Time devoted for managing critical relationships should be one-third of their time.
  • The data also show an excellent correlation between Maturity Level in SRM, Investment, and Returns. Companies classifying themselves as mature or highly effective in SRM had higher investments in SRM and also presented higher returns.
  • So, a simple answer is investment priority.

Where are we going? 

Part of our benchmark survey was related to the next 3-5 years.

  • 70% of responses said SRM is Very Important for the next 3-5 years, and 26% said Somewhat Important, so the great majority believes SRM is an important area in their organization.
  • Most of the companies said they will invest in People, Training, Work Process, and Tools, with People and Training the highest ranked areas.
  • In terms of objectives for the next 3-5 years, the majority of responses said they will focus on two areas: Cost savings through joint collaborative efforts with suppliers; reduction in supply chain risk
  • In order to achieve the full potential of their relationship with suppliers, 52% of responses said they need a Major Change or Total Transformation, and 32% of responses said a Moderate Change is required.
  • So, they see the importance of SRM, they will invest, and most important, they need to change to achieve full value. 

Do you have any recommendations? 

  • Build stronger relationships and enhanced collaboration with key suppliers in order to realize increased value from joint collaboration, technology innovation, and improvements in service and support. 
  • Leverage supplier assets and capabilities to generate a competitive advantage (versus only focusing on purchasing goods and services at a lower cost).
  • Ensure more structured and focused engagement with key suppliers in order to become a Customer of Choice.
  • The benchmark shows that three practices stand out as most likely to yield results: tracking and measuring the total financial and strategic value delivered by SRM; aligning and integrating strategic sourcing, category management, contracting and contract management, and SRM; and developing multi-year strategic plans with the most important suppliers.  

I hope you found this summary useful to your work. Feel free to call me with any concerns you have about SRM at your company.

Taking Purchasing to the next level, 

Paulo Moretti

Download Is SRM Worth the Investment?

Tags: purchasing Supplier relationship management Supply chain management Procurement sourcing SRM
Category: Blog Post

Paulo Moretti


Paulo Moretti is Principal at, a boutique consulting company focused on excellence in the purchasing function for manufacturing industries and market analysis of Chemicals & Plastics industries. 

Prior to becoming Principal, he was Senior Consultant at Vantage Partners, and worked 35 years at The Dow Chemical Company, where he developed experience in such diverse areas as Manufacturing, R&D, Sales, Marketing, Finance, Strategic Planning, e-Business, and Purchasing. 

A native of Brazil now based in the U.S., Moretti holds a Bachelor’s degree in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, with Master’s degrees in Industrial Management and in Business and executive course certifications from Kellogg, Wharton, and MIT Sloan. 





Please add a comment

You must be logged in to leave a reply. Login »

Related Content

Thought Leadership and the Demise of Your Third-Party MRO Outsourcing Program: Part 4

George E. Krauter

When one defines third-party MRO (3PMRO) success, one assumes that fundamental operations are being executed and that expectations are being met (i.e., ROI goals are surpassed} Read More

Guidance for Addressing the New Talent Acquisition Challenge

Dennis Bouley

The US Labor Department reported in March of this year that there were 6.6 million job openings, a record high. Although most of us applaud these numbers Read More

Millennials in Supply Chain Management Seek Advancement and Development Opportunities

Marisa Brown

Millennials working in the supply chain management field don’t fit the mold that the older generation assumes for them. APQC’s recent study Read More

Supplier Profiles


Staples Advantage is the one supplier that offers all the business solutions you need, all with the expertise of a specialty vendor. Read More


It started in 1972 with an idea, a new concept in distribution. Today, Digi-Key Corporation is one of the fastest-growing electronic component distributors in the World. The stimulus for this growth is Digi-Key's customer-centered business philosophy… Read More

Lunney Advisory Group

Lunney Advisory Group was founded in 2007. Our firm is not your typical consulting company. Some members of our firm are highly qualified and experienced industry executives/practitioners while others are full time or adjunct university professors.… Read More


What CEOs Expect Of Purchasing

Guest Contributor

Procurement and supply management leaders have a seat at the table, and management’s expectations are high. But what do CEOs really want, and is purchasing delivering on these expectations? This webcast looks at how procurement and supply management … Read More

Growing Purchasing Influence On Indirect Spending

Guest Contributor

At world-class companies, purchasing’s influence touches just about every area of spending. But, how exactly do procurement teams get to the point where other departments approach them for help with sourcing such indirect categories as human resource… Read More

Procurement-Finance Collaboration

Guest Contributor

Procurement & finance are two business functions which are often at loggerheads with each other. One reason for this is the lack of perception alignment on an important metric of procurement and finance performance - 'savings'. Read More